| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Bomb Launcher I vs BL II? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So on looking at these.....what exactly is the difference? Because they both look almost identical besides launch time? am I missing something? does BLII do more dmg?
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 20:52:00
|
2. Drake/Raven with Cruise/Heavy Missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: And after that I notice 3 posts down you wanted the skinny on small gang pvp. The drake is a much better choice, hands down. Small gangs tend to want to be mobile gangs, with 1 or 2 nano's in the lows a drake can pass as a mob...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 20:39:00
|
3. Drake/Raven with Cruise/Heavy Missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: The drake only has 7 launcher hardpoints. the 8th slot is for utility. Heavy missiles underperform against large targets compared to a cruise raven, but are similar or better on cruiser and below. The drake has a superior pass...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 20:03:00
|
4. Drake/Raven with Cruise/Heavy Missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: Heavy Missiles are more standard than Assaults on Drakes and Crusie on Ravens. Distance over damage is what it equates to, so awesome for pve and has its place in pvp. EDIT Quote: 3x Warhead Rigor Catalyst I I dunno if...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 19:56:00
|
5. Drake/Raven with Cruise/Heavy Missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
PVP/Gang PVP for instance?
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 19:52:00
|
6. Drake/Raven with Cruise/Heavy Missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ok I know Heavy Assault is standard on Drake, as well as Torps standard on Raven. But...is there ANY fit that would work with Heavy Missiles or Cruise Missiles? (since thats what I have at LVL 5 right now). I know it wouldn't be optimal.....but ...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2012.06.13 19:50:00
|
7. My musing on sov 2 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hoo Is I just want to see the threadnaughts full of SuperAlliance tears when this goes live. I so hope it breaks the super (uninhabited) blocks into smaller pieces. I'd love for the small alliance to be able to go and gra...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.09.28 20:47:00
|
8. Is Eve leaning towards a population of carebears and preschoolers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cygnet Lythanea stuff Jump logistics makes all the stuff you just said pretty hard to do.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.09.25 07:09:00
|
9. Noobcorps for Factional Warfare? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nabubrela .. ninja-salvaging ... owned .. carebear .. nerdraging .. noob I'm sensing much bitterness in you.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.22 22:01:00
|
10. Serious question about Dust - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: F'nog And that's just the sort of answer I hope the devs don't have. I don't have any opinion for or against Dust at this point, but I just hope the devs realize that having them play in Eve is like giving them the choice ...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.20 01:13:00
|
11. Serious question about Dust - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Answer; we don't know yet. The devs probably don't want to tell anyone yet.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.20 00:50:00
|
12. GD vs OOP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Generalissima Arguing that DUST514 and how it's going to affect 0.0 Sovereignty (and it's been announced that it is going to) is inappropriate for game play discussion forum because it's "not here yet" is silly. You might as...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.19 22:43:00
|
13. GD vs OOP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can't you send them to CAOD instead? Hell, it might just be an improvement.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.19 22:36:00
|
14. DUST 514: Seperating FACT from SPECULATION - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
protip; facts need citations.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.18 17:41:00
|
15. Is no longer monday. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Orthaen You made me look Also, if they didnt release any patch notes until the monday after the patch, I would actually laugh hard enough that I wouldnt mind. Seconding this, you can't back out now CCP.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.18 00:59:00
|
16. Best Eve Online Killboard Software - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
http://www.alpha-squadron.net That's the OP's killboard. It's just Kale Kolds pirate board, I still prefer EDK.
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.17 16:33:00
|
17. "i accidentally the whole 0.0" - ccp has sense of humour? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cpt Cosmic Conclusion: dont fight @gates or war dec the scums Thereby proving that gateguns do, in fact, bother pirates. :slow clap:
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.17 16:15:00
|
18. Questions about included features in 1.5 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Mr Reason That should be the next thing on the chopping block. Besides, they don't bridge just about EVERYWHERE. They don't need to bridge just about everywhere, they need to bridge to their poses for fuel. They have ti...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.16 14:15:00
|
19. Questions about included features in 1.5 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Mr Reason Lowering hauling capabilities (in amount, range and 'ease of use') is a GOOD thing. It decreases the ability to overextend meaning settled 0.0 alliances will have more trouble controlling/fueling (and thus owning) ...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.16 13:13:00
|
20. What is so great about non-consensual pvp? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: EpicFailTroll I advise you to read up the definition of what a game is. Yes, ships are meant to explode, that not what EFT is discussing, but the fact that non-consensual pvp is dumb, since you spend a lot of time preparin...
- by Sir Muffoon - at 2009.08.09 18:39:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |